Nine post formats that actually travel
These aren't hacks. They're the shapes that survive contact with a feed, because each one gives a reader a reason to finish the first line. Fill in the brackets and delete the ones that don't fit what you actually have.
How to use these
A format doesn't make a boring thing interesting. It makes an interesting thing legible. If you fill one in and it's dull, the problem is the material — go and find a better one rather than reaching for a different template.
1. The reversal
Works because it promises that the next line contradicts the first. Requires you to have actually changed your mind.
The reversal
I spent [time period] convinced that [common belief].
Then [specific thing that happened].
Here's what I'd do differently:
[3-5 short lines, most specific first]
[One line on what it cost you to learn this.]
2. The number in the first line
The number
[Number]. That's how many [unit] it took to [outcome].
Breakdown:
— [component]: [number]
— [component]: [number]
— [component]: [number]
The part that surprised me: [the one non-obvious line item].
3. The thing I deleted
Consistently the highest-engagement shape for founders, because everyone posts what they built and almost nobody posts what they removed.
The deletion
I just deleted [feature / page / process] that took [effort] to build.
Why I built it: [the reasonable-sounding original logic]
Why it had to go: [what actually happened when real people used it]
What replaced it: [usually something much smaller]
4. The specific how-to
The how-to
How to [specific outcome] in [time], without [the expensive/obvious way]:
1. [Action] — [why this order matters]
2. [Action]
3. [Action]
4. [Action]
Takes about [honest time]. The step people skip is [n], and it's the one that does the work.
5. The comparison table
A table stops the scroll because it's visually different from everything around it. Be fair about the alternatives — an obviously rigged comparison is worse than no post.
The comparison
[Option A] vs [Option B] for [specific job]:
Cost: [A] / [B]
Time to set up: [A] / [B]
Breaks when: [A] / [B]
Best for: [A] / [B]
I use [choice] because [one specific reason]. [Genuine case where the other one wins.]
6. The public question
The question
Genuine question for people who [specific role/situation]:
[The question — narrow enough that only about 200 people in the world can answer it well.]
Context: [two lines on why you're asking, including what you've already tried]
I'll share what I learn.
The last line is what makes people answer. Then actually do it — that follow-up post outperforms the question.
7. The receipt
The receipt
[Time period] update on [thing]:
[Metric]: [number] ([change])
[Metric]: [number] ([change])
[Metric]: [number] ([change])
What worked: [one thing, specifically]
What didn't: [one thing, specifically — do not skip this line]
Next: [one thing]
8. The tiny useful thing
The giveaway
I made [small thing] because I got tired of [annoyance].
It [does exactly one job]. Free, no signup, no email.
[Link]
Built it in [honest time]. Take it, fork it, ignore it.
9. The unpopular specific
An opinion narrow enough to be defensible. The failure mode is a vague contrarian take, which reads as bait — the fix is specificity.
The unpopular specific
Unpopular: [narrow, defensible claim about your actual domain].
Not [the broad version everyone argues about]. Specifically [the narrow version].
Reason: [the mechanism, not the vibe]
I'd change my mind if [the specific evidence that would do it].
The two that don't work
| Format | Why it fails |
|---|---|
| The milestone with no story | "We hit 100 users!" is a post about you. Nobody outside your company gets anything from it. Add what you did differently to get from 50 to 100 and it becomes a receipt post, which does work. |
| The generic thread of tips | "10 tools every founder needs" competes with ten thousand identical posts and signals that you have nothing first-hand. One tool you actually use, with the specific reason, beats all ten. |